After more than two years of fighting — and countless hours spent reviewing contracts, exchanging emails, and pressing the issue through formal and informal channels — we won.

An independent arbitrator has ruled in our favor in the grievance over dispatcher certification pay. This is a major victory not only for our fire dispatchers but for the principle that when you earn it, you should be paid for it.

What Was the Issue?

For years, dispatchers who held required EMD and EFD certifications received a 3.75% certification premium — but the City cut off that premium after 40 hours per week, meaning it wasn’t applied to overtime hours unless they qualified under FLSA rules.

The union filed a grievance because:

• Dispatchers use their certifications during every hour of their shifts, including overtime.

• The MOA says eligible employees “shall receive” the 3.75% — and nowhere does it say that stops at 40 hours.

• This wasn’t a negotiated limitation — it was a unilateral misinterpretation—and the City knew it.

We brought the case to arbitration — and the arbitrator agreed with us.

What Did the Arbitrator Say?

The arbitrator found that the City violated the MOA by capping the premium at 40 hours. She ordered the City to:

• Pay the 3.75% premium on all hours worked going forward.

• Issue retroactive backpay for affected dispatchers, going back to the July 2024 pay period.

• Calculate that backpay with interest and in compliance with the contract.

What Happens Now?

We’re now in discussions with the City about how the retroactive payments will be calculated and issued. Our priority is transparency and accuracy — and we’re insisting on a clear accounting for each member affected.

We’ll share updates as soon as we have a timeline and details. In the meantime, this win belongs to all of us.

It’s proof that our contracts matter. That enforcement matters. And that when we stand together and push back — we win

As we prepare for our own contract negotiations in San Jose, we’re fighting for the same things these statewide candidates spoke about; fair pay that keeps up with the cost of living, affordable healthcare for our families, and a city that values the workers who keep it running.

AFSCME members showed in San Diego what solidarity looks like: public service workers standing together, demanding a California that works for everyone, not just the wealthy and well-connected.

Our fight here in San Jose is part of that larger movement. The road ahead will take all of us, united, to make sure our next contract reflects the respect and fairness city workers deserve…. (read more)

Frontline animal shelter workers have spoken with a clear and united voice: San José’s Animal Care and Services Center needs new leadership.

In a staff survey conducted this summer, the overwhelming majority of shelter employees called for the City to bring in a director from outside its current ranks. Their message is simple — it’s time for a fresh start. Workers want a leader who can rebuild trust, restore accountability, and set a new direction for a shelter that has been plagued for years by dysfunction, poor conditions, and low morale.

The results of that survey were recently covered in the Mercury News, where workers’ voices were front and center. The article highlights what staff have been saying for years: the culture inside the shelter cannot change if the same people who presided over past failures remain in charge. You can read the full Mercury News article here.

The stakes are high. A city audit last year exposed…

MEF has taken the City of San Jose to arbitration over its unilateral change to the Flexible Workplace Program. This change forces employees with existing flexible workplace agreements to be in the office at least four days per week instead of three, without negotiating with the Union.

This is a major fight for our members. Instead of handling the case through the City Attorney’s Office as they normally would, the City has hired an outside “special law firm,” the Renee Public Law Group. This firm is known for taking on high-profile fights for cities when the stakes are high or when their legal position is questionable. MEF has submitted an information request to determine how much of the public’s money the City plans to spend on these outside lawyers to take this right away from employees rather than working with us to find a solution.

The City’s first move was to challenge the arbitrability of our grievance, claiming the case does not even belong in arbitration. We view this as an absurd argument and a delay tactic. Our position is that the grievance is clearly covered by the arbitration procedure in our contract, and now the City has the burden of proving otherwise. Unfortunately, the City has developed a pattern of raising procedural technicalities when it wants to avoid addressing the merits of a case.

Here is the current schedule: (more inside)

The City is beginning the process of hiring a new Director for the San José Animal Care Center. This is a moment of real consequence—not just for animal welfare, but for every single worker in the building. The decisions made in the next few weeks will shape the direction of the shelter for years to come.

That’s why we need to speak up.

MEF-AFSCME Local 101 has launched an anonymous survey for current ACS staff to gather your input on what kind of leadership this shelter truly needs. Your responses will guide the union’s conversations with City leadership and help ensure that your voice is part of the hiring process.

🔗 Click here to take the anonymous survey
📄 Read the union’s letter to the City Manager about the hiring panel

Today, we commemorate Juneteenth—the day in 1865 when the last enslaved people in Galveston, Texas learned of their freedom, more than two years after the Emancipation Proclamation. Juneteenth is a celebration of Black liberation and a sobering reminder that justice delayed is justice denied.

For labor, Juneteenth calls us to reflect on our shared struggle. The labor movement and the civil rights movement are deeply